Are you a nonprofit, university or mission-driven climate technology organisation preparing a small-scale field test of an innovative climate intervention? The Climate Intervention Environmental Impact Fund (CIEIF) has opened its sixth grant round, offering three grants of US$75,000 each for environmental impact assessment, predictive modelling and engagement with people who could be affected by the proposed test. Applications are welcomed worldwide, including from eligible African organisations.
Status: OPEN — Deadline: 1 December 2026 (42 calendar days remaining as of 20 October 2026). CIEIF has not stated a specific deadline hour or timezone in the public guidelines, so applicants should confirm this directly with the fund manager and submit in good time.
CIEIF 2026 grants at a glance
| Funder | Climate Intervention Environmental Impact Fund (CIEIF) |
|---|---|
| Number of awards | Three |
| Amount | US$75,000 per grant (US$225,000 across the three awards) |
| Geography | Worldwide, including Africa |
| Priority applicant | Qualified nonprofit institutions, including academic institutions; private business projects may be considered |
| Funding purpose | Environmental impact assessments, predictive impact modelling and/or engagement with affected stakeholders ahead of a climate-intervention field test |
| Deadline | 1 December 2026 (exact closing hour not publicly disclosed) |
| Expected decision | By 1 February 2027 |
| Official guidelines | CIEIF Guidelines for Grant Applicants |
What does CIEIF actually fund?
CIEIF’s distinctive role is to help innovators analyse the consequences of an intervention before a field trial advances. Its grants support independent, objective assessment and public participation, rather than paying for the entire technological experiment or infrastructure.
- Environmental impact assessment (EIA): careful investigation of potential ecological, social, economic and health consequences of a proposed small-scale test.
- Predictive impact modelling: analysis of how the intervention could interact with local environmental conditions, including foreseeable risks and uncertainty.
- Stakeholder engagement: appropriate engagement with potentially affected communities, government agencies, indigenous groups and other relevant people.
At least one of these three activities must be central to the proposed US$75,000 budget. Applicants who ask for general programme implementation or technology development without a relevant impact-analysis component will be rejected under the published guidance.
Which technologies and projects might qualify?
According to CIEIF, potentially relevant climate interventions include biochar, enhanced rock weathering, atmospheric methane removal, certain ocean carbon-removal methods and other innovative interventions with a plausible route to meaningful global climate benefit. A proposal must be sufficiently developed to support a real-world, small-scale field test and should address the environmental risks of that test.
For a concrete African example, CIEIF’s 2026 grantee portfolio includes a Belgium-based project undertaking an enhanced-rock-weathering trial on a farm in Murang’a County, Kenya. Its CIEIF-funded work includes independent environmental assessment, impact modelling and engagement with Kenyan farming organisations. This illustrates the type of risk-assessment work supported; it is not a model or guarantee that all agriculture, biochar or soil-restoration projects will qualify.
Who is eligible—and who is unlikely to be a good fit?
CIEIF welcomes applications from around the world and gives priority, other things being equal, to qualified nonprofit institutions. For-profit companies pursuing relevant field tests may also apply. The fund’s latest programme description excludes government agencies, individuals and students.
Probably not a fit: conventional climate adaptation, routine tree planting, community resilience, clean-energy deployment, generic emissions reduction, standard sustainable-development projects and basic academic research. CIEIF also specifically excludes direct air capture (DAC), carbon capture utilisation and storage (CCUS), and stratospheric or higher solar-radiation management. A worthy climate project is not automatically a fundable CIEIF project.
Applicants should also demonstrate that their intervention addresses a root cause of global warming or a major global effect of it, and that the results of funded analysis can be independently peer reviewed and made public. CIEIF support is not a substitute for required permits, licences or government environmental compliance.
The ten areas an application must cover
The donor has no standard application form or template. Instead, applications must respond to ten specified questions in English, no longer than 20 single-spaced pages, using 12-point font. Important supporting papers and biographies can be linked or provided as supplementary material.
- Team and entity: full contact details, biographies, roles and organisational website.
- Proposed field test: prior science, technology readiness, proposed location, innovation, foreseeable environmental and social risks, and global scalability.
- Approvals: government permits or permissions that may be required.
- Scientific evidence: prior publications addressing feasibility and potential global-scale benefits.
- Independent expertise: identify at least two independent consulting firms capable of providing relevant EIA, modelling or related specialist services.
- US$75,000 budget: clearly allocate funds to EIA, modelling and/or engagement, including appropriate staff and consultant time and closely connected expenses.
- Other financing: disclose the project’s other funding sources.
- Insurance: describe any relevant coverage for the proposed test.
- Publication commitment: confirm willingness to publish the results at an appropriate time.
- Other material facts: provide essential details that the preceding questions do not cover.
Important: CIEIF bans AI-generated applications
CIEIF expressly states that AI use in grant applications and cover letters is unacceptable. Its published rules warn that a detected violation may lead to immediate rejection and exclusion from future applications. Therefore, do not use GrantsWriterAI or another generative AI service to write or rewrite material submitted as part of a CIEIF application. Have qualified project investigators and technical advisers prepare the submission in accordance with the donor’s rules. This Africads article provides independent public information only; it is not application text or a substitute for the official guidelines.
How should an applicant prepare a credible budget and assessment plan?
First separate costs of the proposed field test itself from costs of analysing its potential impacts. CIEIF is financing the latter. Show what independent expertise will be engaged, when work will take place, which affected groups need consultation and how findings will be evaluated and reported. Include justified risk-management measures and scientific uncertainty instead of making unsupported safety claims.
As a purely illustrative planning exercise—not a required donor budget—a team might assign US$28,000 to independent impact assessment, US$22,000 to modelling, US$15,000 to community and stakeholder engagement, and US$10,000 to closely associated analysis, documentation and review expenses. Actual applicants must follow their own technical scope and the funder’s permissible-cost rules.
The initial one-third of the US$75,000 grant is payable after technical scoping discussions; the second and third portions follow a negotiated milestone schedule. Repeated annual funding may be possible, but is not promised. Read the exact grant guidance before planning cashflow.
How to submit before 1 December 2026
- Read What We Do and the ten-question application guidelines to decide whether the intervention and proposed analytical work qualify.
- Ask the project team to assemble its own scientific studies, site information, permitted activities, stakeholder plan and independently prepared application in line with CIEIF’s ban on AI-written materials.
- Before transmitting the completed application, contact Peter T. Jenkins, Fund Manager, at info@CIEIF.org; he will explain the preferred submission method. There is no generic online application form.
- Submit by 1 December 2026. The official guidance expects grant decisions to be announced by 1 February 2027.
Frequently asked questions
Can a Kenyan NGO or university apply?
Yes, if it is a qualified institution with a suitable innovative climate-intervention field test and an eligible impact-assessment plan. The programme is open internationally.
Can a social enterprise apply?
Yes, eligible for-profit projects are considered, although nonprofit institutions receive preference where other factors are equal.
Can an NGO apply for an ordinary climate adaptation or renewable-energy project?
No. CIEIF expressly excludes those categories; the fund is for impact analysis associated with innovative climate interventions nearing field testing.
Does the grant finance the field test itself?
Not as its main purpose. It finances environmental assessment, predictive modelling and/or stakeholder engagement around the proposed field test.
Can GrantsWriterAI be used to prepare the application?
No. CIEIF’s published guidance explicitly prohibits AI use in application and cover-letter content.
What should organisations do next?
Review the official guidelines first and decide on technical eligibility before investing staff time. Organisations assessing their wider readiness can use the free Africads Funding Readiness Toolkit for general internal governance, programme, evidence and budget checks, but should not use AI to generate CIEIF submission materials. Our separate guide on environmental safeguards explains why environmental and social risk analysis matters in grant-funded projects.
Looking for more relevant, verified funding calls? Subscribe free to Africads Grant News. For organisation-level funding readiness and non-writing support enquiries, contact Kimanzi@africadslive.com.
Last verified: 20 October 2026. Official primary sources: CIEIF’s June 2026 sixth-round announcement, What We Do, Grant Guidelines and Current Grants. Check the donor’s current pages before taking action.